Some Thoughts on the Resurrection
I manuscripted my first point in order to help clarify my own thinking. My first observation was that the Resurrection Vindicated Jesus; it's basically devotional reflections on Romans 1:4. I know it's not on James, but since we're in between lessons and none of you were in with the adults, I'm including that first point below and offer it for your encouragement and meditation. Happy Easter!
The Resurrection Vindicated Jesus
To be sure, the resurrection vindicated Jesus, in the sense that it showed He was Who He said He was. The resurrection was the fulfillment of prophecy, especially Jesus’ own prophecy concerning Himself. John 2:18-22 So the Jews answered and said to Him, "What sign do You show to us, since You do these things?" 19 Jesus answered and said to them, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." 20 Then the Jews said, "It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and will You raise it up in three days?" 21 But He was speaking of the temple of His body. 22 Therefore, when He had risen from the dead, His disciples remembered that He had said this to them; and they believed the Scripture and the word which Jesus had said.” However, the resurrection did more than just demonstrate that He meant what He said and that His prophecies were fulfilled. Listen to the opening words of the book of Romans - Romans 1:1-4 Paul, a bondservant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated to the gospel of God 2 which He promised before through His prophets in the Holy Scriptures, 3 concerning His Son Jesus Christ our Lord, who was born of the seed of David according to the flesh, 4 and declared to be the Son of God with power according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead.” Here the resurrection makes plain that Jesus is the Son of God. Does this imply that He was not the son of God previously? Certainly not. Rather, He has by the resurrection been declared, or that word could also be translated “appointed” the Son of God WITH POWER. During the incarnation, we understand that Jesus humbled Himself taking on the form of a servant. With the resurrection He has been appointed to a new status (for lack of a better term). Having been glorified He is no longer the humble servant but now the exalted King. At the beginning of this verse, Paul describes Him as Jesus Christ our Lord. Let me digress for just a moment. This is a phrase we often take for granted to the point that I think we may fail to see its significance. First of all we need to get a hold of the name Jesus Christ. Christ is not His surname, like Nate MIHELIS. Furthermore, it is not as if Jesus is His human name and Christ, His divine moniker. No, the term Christ is a transliteration of the Greek christos which means “anointed one” or messiah. Likewise, lord is not a title that should be taken lightly, sort of like “sir” or “mr.” No, lord was a term used to speak of the emperor, as in “Caesar is lord.” So what do you get when you put it all together? Paul is explicitly saying, the resurrection demonstrated that Jesus the Messiah is King.” After all, this is what Paul and his companions where accused of in Thessalonica. Right after the rulers of the city accused them of turning the world upside down, they charged them with these words: Acts 17:7 “…these are all acting contrary to the decrees of Caesar, saying there is another king -- Jesus." Paul’s message is clear: Jesus the Messiah is King and He brooks no rivals!” That’s quite a statement. It’s the kind of statement that changes the course of history. Are you starting to see why the resurrection is so significant?
I know it was long, but any thoughts?
4 Comments:
I believe that the resurrection is what distinguishes the Christians from every other faith. Every other religion, sect, cult, you name it, has in one way or another a human figure head, one who claims he has been sent by God or "commissioned" by God. The Muslims for example have Mohammed. Mohammed has a man who claimed spiritual insight and claimed he had an "ordained" mission. However Mohamed died and that was the end of Mohammed. However with Jesus, he has crucified and rose again in three days defeating an obstacle that no other man, including the world conquering Alexander, could defeat. Our God proved not only in life but in death he is king. I think I am in the right direction or maybe I'm full of hot air either way that's what I think. Let me know if I'm on the right track or if I'm starting a new cult.
Josh L
I agree with what Josh said. I love the thought of the resurrection--As believers in Christ this is our hope.
Continuing on with the resurrection thoughts.
I have been reading in John 11, and seeing how John specifically laid out seven different miracles with this one of raising Lazuras as being the climax of the signs of Chirst in this Gospel. John used this miracle to be the last and greatest of Jesus' public ministry, and brought a final demonstration of His mastery of human problems and a convincing proof of His claim to be the resurrection and the life.
So to reiterate was Nate said--"the resurrection vindicated Jesus, in the sense that it showed He was Who He said He was," not only in raising Lazarus, but in his own resurrection. Jesus showed he was/is the one who controls life and was/is the hope of our resurrection.
Though I'm no expert on world religions, of the one's I can think of I think you're right on target. The resurrection is indeed unique to Christianity and that's one of the primary reasons it vindicates Jesus! The ressurection has tremendous implications and should not be narrowed to one or two. If you want to read some more, there's a post on a blog I read regularly that lists a bunch more implications. See the post " What does the resurrection mean?" at Euangelion (http://michaelfbird.blogspot.com/).
along the same lines, in the resurrection, Christ's kingship, or absolute sovereignty was proved in that he overcame death. Death is the penalty that God prescribed for sin. The implication is that Christ has power over sin and sin's penalty; a power that is translated to believers not just for for justification, but for sanctification as well. Which ties very nicely into the discussion Sunday on the fact that faith must necessarily produce works.
Rob
Post a Comment
<< Home